DO we have a primary source black cotten versus wool fibers?
I'll check.
Sounds like wishful thinking to me.
On my part or hers?
Why didn't JR situationally molest JAR MR ER BR or have *advertiser censored* on his computer or in his house, why, when he divorced his first wife, MR or ER situational molestation wasn't raised?
One question at a time please. (And keep in mind that we are just spitballing.)
Why didn't JR situationally molest JAR MR ER BR?
JAR and BR can be discounted because they were males. Like I said, situational molesters use children as replacements for adult objects of desire. JR has shown an attraction to females. So that lets them out. As for ER and MR, there was no need. It probably never even occurred to him. Yes, he did get a little on the side, which is why she divorced him in the first place, but his mistress was an adult too.
That's pretty much my point: during his first marriage, he had his wife and his mistress to fulfill his sexual needs. But, as I see it, when PR got sick, it was a whole new ballgame. Her sickness and treatments left her unable to enjoy sex (if not unable to engage in it entirely). Getting a mistress was out for three reasons:
1) Too hard to keep secret. He got caught once. He knew the risks.
2) Imagine the scandal of cheating on an ill woman. (To say nothing of what her family might have done.)
3) He had suffered a pretty severe mental shock at that point. He'd lost ER to a car accident. A bright young woman cut down in the very flower of life. That probably scared him. It would scare me.
What I'm saying is that, in his mind (again, to my thinking), adults were too risky. He'd gotten divorce, buried ER, and PR was very sick. Even though she lived, she was beyond repair in that way. So who does that leave? JB. She was "safe." By that I mean she was too young to get cancer, she was too young to get herself killed behind the wheel of a car, and she was easy to manipulate into silence due to her training and sexualization for pageant competition. And she reminded him of PR. JR said it himself: JB was PR, through and through.
That's how I see it.
Why didn't JR have *advertiser censored* on his computer or in his house?
Any number of reasons. Maybe because he figured he was a "real man" who didn't "need" *advertiser censored* when he could get the real thing.
DeeDee said:
JAR, BR, MR or ER were not JB. JB was sexualized, tarted up like a showgirl. (as a matter of fact one of her more infamous pageant outfits was exactly like a showgirl's costume).I don't think this is a comparison that works.
I don't either, for the reasons I outlined above. Still, I am glad he asked. It shows he's keen to learn, even if he doesn't agree with it.
DeeDee said:
I'd discount molestation of the sons simply because in a situation like this, the parent would be less likely to molest a same-sex child.
Agreed, fully.
DeeDee said:
Parental sexual abuse is not always true pedophilia. They are not necessarily attracted to the child as much as they are attracted to the availability of the child.
Thank you, that's what I'm trying to say.
DeeDee said:
If he molested JB, it would be because she was she appealed to him in a way that his other children did not.
I would combine that with the psychological factors as well.