Crisis Intervention does not usually include mail from an unknown sender. If there was a crisis with a patient there would usually be visits or calls involved, imo.
Right. And boy, do we really continue with intense assumptions. We don't know that the doctor he sent it to was a clinical psychiatrist, treating any patients at all! He could have been a professor or a research psychiatrist at the school. They don't have patients.
Studies have shown violent sociopaths often have less gray matter in certain areas of the brain used for impulse control and I believe empathy.
Head blows/injury can also damage certain parts of the brain causing behavior changes. Bobby Joe Long was a perfectly normal guy turned serial killer after a motorcycle accident, he woke up in the hospital and started fantasizing about raping women, which turned into serial murder.
Brain tumors could effect the same areas of the brain depending on the location of the tumor. I doubt this is a brain tumor BUT tumors of that sort can cause aberrant behavior. I realize it is easier to just say "evil monster" as then no sympathy is required.
BBM. What you are saying may be true, but I do not believe that soul, or choice or good vs. evil do not play a part. And I'm sorry, but I simply can't feel sympathy for sociopaths who destroy others. Should I feel sorry for casey anthony? scott peterson? joseph duncan? Hitler?
Maybe it makes me unevolved but I'm saving my sympathy for their victims.
Would you say the same about the experts discussing this case in the news? Frankly, I don't see us discussing the "why" as being any different than what is currently being shown all across new stations and online. Experts giving their opinions. Of course, nobody can give an absolute diagnosis. Nobody is privy to that information yet. We discuss and throw out possible theories.
Personally, I have not seen anyone excusing what he has done.
I think any expert who professes to know or be certain what the coward's mental status is, is an irresponsible blow hole and should shut the heck up. Most of them are essentially whoring themselves out for money and I don't trust a word they say.
Discussing the possibility of what could be going on in the mind of a murderer like this guy is one thing. Stating a certainty is quite another and very irresponsible for an expert who has not examined him, to do. It just makes for good ratings.
As far as not seeing anyone excusing what he was done, I have posted a few examples of just that. They are re-posted below.
Basically, you can word it all you want but when people talk about sympathy for a murderer, or how their brain matter or brain tumors prevents them from being able to control what they do, or how mental illness renders them not responsible for their acts or how a mentally ill person who commits a violent act is not the same as a drunk who decides to get on the road with his vehicle, but more like a diabetic who has insulin shock, that is excusing and justifying what this person did. What else would you call that?
The difference is we have posters here stating they know he is mentally ill. The only people who can know that for sure will be the psychiatrists who evaluate him.
Right.
Interesting, from what little I know mental health professionals do NOT presume to diagnose anyone without having personally interviewed them, it is some sort of professional ethics thing.
For a psychiatrist to see someone in a short court room video, under stress, and then decide they are probably "faking it" seems quite unusual indeed. Perhaps psychiatric diagnosis is a whole lot simpler than we are lead to believe.
Yes. I agree. But many have no problem when "experts" or laypersons do the opposite and deem this creep to be absolutely and seriously ill. Why is that?
I have followed the Giddings/McDaniel case very closely (local to me) and I do agree, I do not think Stephen is insane. This Holmes guy I am not so sure about, a lot of the things he has done do not seem rational at all.
Well, the guy in that case allegedly suddenly attacked a friend, neighbor and fellow student, who he had known for years, because, as he stated, she wanted his penis, and then he decided to kill her before losing his virginity with her dead corpse and finally hacked her body to bits with a hacksaw that he afterwards kept in his possession, and dumped her body on the property where he lived. Why is he not crazy and this one is? According to some posters, anyone who commits such an act must be severely insane.
BBM. Please see above.
And yeah, I think such discussion is fine but it gets aggravating when people are stating it as fact and that has happened repeatedly.
Bump for those who keep asserting that there has been no excusing or justification of the murderer's behavior.