LambChop
Former Member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2008
- Messages
- 21,160
- Reaction score
- 29
I totally agree with you here. I think we should look at the evidence and cross examine the evidence. I don't think we should be relying on Casey to prove that she is guilty. I think she is not guilty based on the evidence upon further examination doesn't pan out anything that would make me think she is guilty.
And don't sha know that defense has that evidence and that is their job, right, to look at the evidence and poke holes in it. Only thing we have heard from that camp is how "technically" unqualified their experts are with new technology and they need more time to produce their witness list and discovery. KC does not have to say a word and has not done so. The accident plea was already presented to her if she would take them to Caylee, and KC turned it down. Taking into consideration what was found at the remains site it is quite obvious why she would not take the deal.