Maybe some of that tar & feathers is also for the other things on her plate...MFH, Sexting w/MC...to just name a couple...she hasn't exactly got the scorecard of an angel either.
"Alleged" MFH plot--and she called the police during their idiotic sting.
She was an idiot, IMHO, to do that sexting. Then again, IMHO, there's been a lot of idiocy by a lot of people in this entire story.
Now, let's speculate. It's been alleged that KH was seeing someone else(not proven--only mentioned to make a debating point). If it turns out that was true, and he visited her, or even if the reason the "safe house" address was shared because it was hers, and he was staying with her, then the "sexting rule" applies.
Meaning that if KH has an intimate friend, then he therefore is cold, doesn't care, is immoral, and is probably guilty. This is the sauce/goose/gander rule.
Frankly, I find many people in this case morally distasteful, but that doesn't make them guilty of a crime. There's a whole raft of people who in my book aren't "angels" and have a consistent history of behavior I find to be low-class, BUT that doesn't mean they're criiminals. There's a line between moral judgments and legal judgments, IMHO.
Judging character is a slippery slope (especially from afar). Someone may be sexually promiscuous but otherwise be a very good person who does nothing wrong other than live outside average mores.
Someone may be sexually straight-laced and actually be an embezzler, or worse.