You guys are right - there is hardly anything to go on as far as JB's words on the Internet.
Here is a snippet, I believe from her protection order. I have underlined the key points in this statement and will comment afterward:
"
He became furious like I have never seen him before, he grabbed me by my hair in front of
our daughter, dragged me into our hallway, threw me down on the floor and then threw me against a
decorative column we have in the entrance of our home. He continued to assault me with his feet by
kicking me and then he took out his car keys and
contrived to scratch me in any area he could. The most,
most recent have been his threats to kill me if I say anything against him or if in any way I proceed with action of seeking custody of
our two
small children. I live in constant fear for
my life and my childrens life. Please investigate and help
me!
JB starts the statement with "he" and continues to use "he" rather than "Solomon." This shows distance and it is appropriately used. Pronouns are key in statement analysis, so when JB uses "our" instead of the "my" it goes along with the separation that a pending divorce has brought. She uses "our" later on as well. When JB talks about the decorative column, she is using extra words that she doesn't need to use. In statement analysis, the shortest sentence is the best sentence, so why go through the trouble of listing the specifics of where Solomon threw her? Probably for the effect and dramatization factor. She uses the word "kicking," which is inappropriate in statement analysis work because it is
present tense - which comes in the middle of a past tense statement. This shows an alteration in reality. So it was either a deceptive claim or one that didn't happen the way she is saying it. I don't know if JB has a problem with her English usage, but she has unique terms, such as "contrived to scratch me..." It doesn't make sense - did Solomon actually tell her "I'm going to scratch you in any area on your body that I can!" A very strange description, which I take as deceptive. When a word is replicated like "most, most" it is a way for the speaker (or writer) to attempt to convince, so she repeats the word to make it sound really important. Again, another example of coercion on her part. Adding in excessive words, like "our" two
small children, this is meant to add extra fuel to the fire that she is creating. "Small" is a sympathy word - like "defenseless." Finally - it is all about JB. Note who she puts first when she talks about fearing for
her life (and her children's). When people list things in their statements, they list the important things in order. She is at the top of her own list. And in the last sentence, when she writes "please help
me," what happened to her kids?
The only true way to look at her deceptiveness would be a formal analysis of her interview w/ LE about the events that occurred when Sky went missing. I'm going to try and get in touch w/ the lead investigator to request JB's statement. Does anyone have a direct contact email?
My thoughts about her public image on FB and her "blog"? Bizarre!
On her FaceBook page - she lists her occupation as Full Time Mommy!
- I am struck by the way she added both an exclamation point and a smile. This tells me that she is NOT happy with this role. She felt as though she needed to add the smile, as if to say "I'm happy" - which is an excessive addition which doesn't need to be made. The exclamation point refers to an emphatic symbol that demands attention - such as in "Help!" Also, JB has her status as "married" - she didn't change that during the separation? Her pictures feature Maile, but there are none of Sky (except for her profile picture). Again, the false front that she has put on to the world. Her info button is odd too. Her movies are all children's movies, she comes off as being very religious (several references to the Bible and Jesus), she is conservative (in written word anyway) - focusing on being a Republican, etc. And then the whole Justin Bieber thing - she writes "He is so pretty," which may be true, but for a woman in her 30s, she has a crush. Finally, she is not very verbose - she keeps her comments really brief, as though she's not comfortable expressing herself.
Her blog - besides the fact that it is really troubling to listen to the kids cry during the parenting exchanges, JB remains nonplussed. And to make a blog about this? Not sure what she was trying to do. There was not a lot to go on with her words in these recordings.
