I don't agree. this is a result of political posturing.
Political posturing by the jury?
I don't agree. this is a result of political posturing.
Political posturing by the jury?
A Federal warrant has been issued.
could someone please explain to me why this guy did not get convicted of the involuntary manslaughter? I get that he may not have meant to kill anyone but they gave the jury the manslaughter option if they felt the DA couldnt prove the other charges...geesh
This verdict was nothing but a political referendum much like the OJ verdict. Sickening miscarriage of justice. As a former prosecutor I am appalled. This is the result of sanctuary cities. This is what happens when states fail to protect their citizens. Shameful. Hopefully this administration actually DOES something about this.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
So, I read that the bullet was said to have ricocheted off pavement/concrete and then hit Kate. What evidence suggested that?
You totally nailed it! Jury was making a political statement. I wonder how they are sleeping.This verdict was nothing but a political referendum much like the OJ verdict. Sickening miscarriage of justice. As a former prosecutor I am appalled. This is the result of sanctuary cities. This is what happens when states fail to protect their citizens. Shameful. Hopefully this administration actually DOES something about this.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Juries don't always look at the evidence presented and go for the foregone conclusion of the community or prosecutors. The prosecutors had to prove their case better. Just as in OJ, Michael Brown, Trayvon Martin and others, there are some who believe that emotional or political opinions should count toward the verdict. It doesn't. These people sat and listened to the evidence and took the instructions to heart. We can be angry at the actions of this man but to take it out on the jury is inappropriate. JMHO.
he will be deported. im sure they have an ICE detainer on him.
I don't agree. Juries are suppose to fulfill their duty to consider the facts, (all of them), to leave politics out of their decision. In this case I do not believe they did this.
no the whole incident was used as a political platform and SF was castigated by ppl. I believe it made it difficult to find an impartial jury there. but enough about that. its not the place.
Exactly. Had there not been an attempt to scapegoat an entire demographic due to the actions of one criminal, this woman's family may very well had justice. This woman's murder wound up being an afterthought of a much larger agenda, and it backfired. This poor family.
Yeah, deport him out so he can come back in... AGAIN! This has to stop! I don't have a problem with immigration at all. But there are legal ways to come here. And there are laws of this country that must be abided by. Those that chose to ignore all laws do not need to be here. Same for citizens of this country! If citizens can't abide by the laws, they are welcome to sit in a prison cell for the rest of their lives.
I didn't follow this case closely, nor did I see any of the trial and what evidence the jury had to base their verdict on. I'm sickened that lady was murdered through no fault at all of her own! She was out with her daddy. Some illegal, non caring, non law abiding man thinks he is entitled to be here! No. Put him in federal prison until he rots. Sending him back will do no good. He'll be released there, and right back in the states in no time. Probably committing more crimes.
As for these sanctuary cities... stop all funding to them, and start arresting those in positions that are allowing this! Either they abide by the federal laws, or they can sit in a prison as well. If we say one group of people can ignore the laws, then what does that say to the next group? That they don't have to abide by them either. Not good.
where would this guy who cannot put 3 words together to make a sentence get a federal agent's gun ? and what was the deal about the reporters getting attacked by rival reporters that drove off in a BMW ? I am not a conspiracy theorist but something sure is odd about this entire ordeal. Mr Sanchez keeps saying he was going to shoot seals and that he found the gun wrapped in a fluffy t-shirt. He did say that repeatedly and that was about the only thing he kept repeating other than he took some sort of drink that knocked him out.
You totally nailed it! Jury was making a political statement. I wonder how they are sleeping.