You worked in a CO DA's office? Interesting...
In any event, the wording of the statute and the constitution indeed do not indicate "no bail" is automatic. As you state, unless they demonstrate the standard. Which is presicely what the law states.
If the state can show great presumption and evident proof, then no bail is a given.
And of course it's unlikely that the state would charge a defendant with capital crimes without that.
However...if after such charges, significant exculpatory evidence emerges, of course the defense has the right to a bail hearing. Because at that point great presumption and evident proof would no longer exist.
This is constitutional stuff we are talking about.
I feel very confident in taking the bet that the autopsy showed nothing that changed the focus from CW as the culprit.
If there had been the defense would be shouting that from the rooftops.