gitana1
Verified Attorney
- Joined
- May 31, 2005
- Messages
- 29,359
- Reaction score
- 229,686
It was posted on twitter by a reporter who was covering the preliminary hearing. It may also be in news articles.
Well here's the thing: Nowhere in the affidavit does it indicate an Idaho number that PF called pinged near KB's home on 11-22.
Does everyone think LE and the DA just stupidly decided to detail at the prelim, but then ignore, their own evidence that KK was at the house on 11-22? Why would they mention it at all if they weren't going to use it to show KK was there?
It's weird to me that so many here think they've cracked the case using information they think LE and the DA presented in the affidavit and at the prelim, but it just completely went over the actual professionals' heads.