I don't think you are lying. 1. I am saying the school did not recruit them ( call them, scout them or go through the NCAA channel) because they would have had to prove their abilities that way. The school looked them as potential candidates for the team based on the word of the now-fired athletic director/coach ( LA TIMES: Senior associate athletic director Donna Heinel and men’s and women’s water polo coach
Jovan Vavic were fired after allegedly receiving bribes totaling more than $1.3 million and $250,000, respectively, to help parents take advantage of the relaxed admissions standards for athletes at USC even though their children were not legitimately being recruited as athletes) Neither daughter was ranked, rowed for their school or competitive community teams. The family intermediary talked them up and intervened with the athletic department to vouch for them. No coach scouted them. Their high school did not report their athletic activity. 2. If this girl was told by the other indicted people that this is how you get a leg up (using a sport or an illusion that you would row for the college and you had skills) she might not have known that it was illegal. Although she took the photos, did she know it was fraud? I don't know.
From People and BBM: "The complaint alleges that
Loughlin and her husband had her daughters pose as coxswains for a local crew team and on rowing machines, adding that federal agents obtained emails from Loughlin and her husband allegedly implicating them in the scam.
Starting on April 22, 2016,
Giannulli emails an unnamed cooperating witness and copies Loughlin saying that he and his wife had just met with their oldest daughter’s college counselor and that he wanted to “fully understand the game plan and make sure we have a roadmap for success as it relates to [our daughter] and getting her into a school other than [Arizona State University]!”
On July 24, 2016, the corroborating witness emailed Giannulli essentially saying his
oldest daughter was unlikely to get into USC on academics alone.
Thereafter, the Giannullis agreed with [the witness] to use bribes to facilitate her admission to USC as a recruited crew coxswain, even though she did not row competitively or otherwise participate in crew,” the complaint alleges.
That September,
Giannulli sent the witness an email of his oldest daughter on a rowing machine a month before Donnal Heinel, the senior associate athletic director at USC, allegedly presented the teen as a recruit to the crew team.
Several months later, in 2017, USC mailed the oldest daughter her formal acceptance letter, the complaint states.
Later, when the witness asked if they would allegedly need help with their daughter, Loughlin added, “Yes USC for [our younger daughter]!”
The complaint alleges that the corroborating witness devised a plan to “present their younger daughter, falsely, as a crew coxswain for the L.A. Marina Club team, and requested that the Giannullis’s send an ‘Action Picture,’ asking a few days later for a picture on the ‘erg’ — or rowing machine, which Giannulli did a few days later.”
Heinel presented the Giannullis’s younger daughter to the USC subcommittee for athletic admissions on or about November 2, 2017, when a subcommittee approved her conditional admission to USC, the document states.
After the daughter’s admission, Loughlin allegedly emailed the corroborating witness: “This is wonderful news,” and used a high-five emoji.
In December of 2017,
the guidance counselor at the younger daughter’s high school questioned her being recruited for crew at USC like her older sister, when she didn’t row, which Giannulli allegedly fraudulently confirmed for the counselor the following April, according to the complaint.
.