I don't know that all the blame should be placed on KOAA -- they simply aired what the single cameraman provided for all the participating networks, and the defense is picking on them as the example. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if every network showed that "zoom in" on the podium clip.
Be reminded that MSM typically files motions for expanded media coverage (EMC) for advisements and arraignments pursuant to Rule 3, Chapter 38 of the Colorado Supreme Court Rules.
If granted, Court also says there will only be one camera for shared pool, and let's the networks hash it out. Court does not involve themselves here.
(I also recall earlier Frazee hearing where the Denver network that was going to provide the camera pool, was delayed by the weather, and a Colo Springs network jumped in last minute with a camera).
Asking for sanctions against the media is very dramatic here -- and to try and use this incident to ban / cease all electronics in the courtroom moving forward will be vigorously opposed by the Colorado Media Alliance group. They're a pretty powerful group too.
MOO
ETA: I also noticed that the court record reflects that the Judge "reviewed" the order for sanctions on 5/27/19, but has not ruled.