I can find all the media links that first reported "The Man with folded arms"....but I can't find any links where it was confirmed he was identified as an innocent bystander nor any apology.
Yes, that would make sense seeing that all this information they speak of comes after the raid on BS.Yes, I think that they are being clever with their words too.
Non-specific info from a member of the public could mean so many things someone working for Telstra, someone who lives with a possible perp, someone who saw a van in a certain area that day, someone working for an internet provider, an informant .
The detective at the presser definitely said that he was not going into detail so as not to compromise the investigation.
Its ok Blessed.... So there was no Media....just the FB post?...that answers my question.
Yes, that would make sense seeing that all this information they speak of comes after the raid on BS.
And about the media. I get frustrated with them. I wish they would report the facts without putting their own spin on it. At the same time sometimes I wonder if they know more than they can say and try to get the info out without getting into trouble.
I think the timing is interesting, they seized BS's computer etc a few weeks ago. You'd imagine they'd have the results of that by now, timing of this search is interesting if they're related
It would be chilling if it was in reference to something they found on his computer.
I keep seeing articles referring to how close the search area is to the Spedding home. My question si---"isn't it close to everyone in that little town? I mean if there was another suspect in that general area, would the search area be described as 'so close' ?
Can you elaborate as i looked at that photo plenty and never saw anything?Blessed....I have seen time and time again where the media have been used by police. The most interesting times are when things are put out there and then removed and barely mentioned again... - as in the "Folded Arms Man".
Usually the media are like a dog with a bone...they don't let things go that simply.
But when they do - sometimes you have to question why?
Also the picture and especially the area on the mans fingers has me interested - I'm sure some people here would know why.
Can you elaborate as i looked at that photo plenty and never saw anything?
Can you elaborate as i looked at that photo plenty and never saw anything?
Yes i see what your seeing and i understand. I dont think those faint inkings would come up so dark in a photo from that far. Could be wrong and understand your line of thought!If you can get the image again.....enlarge the hand area.
It could be just my imagination but it looked like the person had a dark area on his fingers.
I have my own POI....and went back to look to see if this individual had anything on their fingers.
They did in 2014.
But then again sometime we allow our imaginations to run away with us when we have a "Belief"...that could be all I am doing
and it not be what I seeing...rather what I want to see. Sorry....I probably am making no sense whatsoever.