http://www.actionnewsjax.com/news/n...exclusive-ruben-ebron-face-face-interv/nnCGf/
Interesting that the reporter wasn't allowed to bring camera, note pad or pen. I wonder if she was allowed to record audio (do they even use tape recorders anymore?).
Otherwise this article contains simply what the reporter remembers (meaning no offense to her). If the article came back to bite him on the bum then WRE could claim she got it wrong, especially with no video, audio (assuming it wasn't recorded) or written notes to back it up.
Just musing...probably a moot point because the interview doesn't reveal anything new. However, hypothetically speaking, if I wanted to preserve my good name/proclaim my innocence, I'd want to be sure the reporter got all the details correctly. Now, if I was guilty of something, I wouldn't want a camera recording my words, vocal intonations, facial expressions...the thinks a profiler might be able to use against me. Just my two cents...