MOO.
I've wondered the same because 2 or 3 people who are brand new posters when I first see and started questioning them struck me that way. Of course I then realize that a week ago I was also brand new and posting the first time. Might have struck someone else the same way.
No doubt about that! Thankfully for me that didn't happen! Although I wouldn't have put it past my ex for one minute. My ex did get a mutual PTO against my b-i-l though, so he could make it look as if what he was saying was true. It was mutual because my b-i-l filed for one against the ex too. People do some crazy things that most can't even begin to wrap their heads around. JMO
"Scarpered" is a good term
Nope. Not referring to you specifically. But I will say that all of the things you are saying about having an open mind and things aren't always as they appear can be said in each and every missing case and in every crime case you can find here and the truth of the matter is that with very few exceptions in those thousands of cases everything is as it appears. This case will not be an exception. There are too many coordinated activities and movements by connected individuals (extends beyond the people we can talk about) to be mere coincidence.
Alex had supposedly moved to Rexburg with Lori by October. The police quote multiple suspicious circumstances in Tammy's case. It will take up to three months to figure out why Alex died. Charles Vallow's jeep was caught on CCTV as being associated with the attack on Brandon. I'm sure the police are in the process of figuring out who was behind the wheel, but there aren't many candidates. Brandon was asked not to give details about the incident to the public.
I've wondered the same because 2 or 3 people who are brand new posters when I first saw posts struck me that way. Of course I then realize that a week ago I was also brand new and posting the first time. Might have struck someone else the same way.
Yeah the ex is still around. I would hope that the kids will be produced soon. I'm not to say that I feel like they are in serious danger, but I'm not going to discredit the fact that it would make things go a lot easier if they were brought fourth. It would certainly quail a lot of the speculation. MOO
Duly noted. So saying people are involved in cults because the family of the "victims" says so is ok? Not being facecious, but just asking. Honestly I thought this was a forum of discussion rather than a forum directed toward one side or the other based off of other posts. Sorry I misunderstood the premise here.
It's not that I don't understand what any of you are saying. I just don't look at everything as it's concrete, if that makes sense. I look at the all the way around of things. Like many others, I thought too at first that these people were probably guilty, but then I started noticing things. Things I can't post here of course because they not permitted, but enough to make me have doubts as to some of the claims family is making. I'm one of those people who was wrongly accused so naturally, and I hope you can understand, I never want to see anyone be charged with something they may not have done. I'm not saying they haven't done anything, but merely what of they haven't. JMO
