Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oddly contradictory to what David Bursten says (start at 7:50) in this podcast less than a month after the murders:
I agree with you, although technically they had not released “Guys…” yet. So he said they have more audio and that was true. Just a very tiny amount. ImoMOO early hints they had more audio and video were bluffs.
I agree with you, although technically they had not released “Guys…” yet. So he said they have more audio and that was true. Just a very tiny amount. Imo
I know exactly what you mean. My voice to my ear sounds nothing like my voice on the answering machine. It could very well be the reason nobody has been identified by the audio Libby recorded.
I stillxwonder if Sheriff Leazenby has ever figured out where he's heard that voice before. He seemed very sure he had.
I wonder if the investigators following up on tips and doing interviews made written notes or recorded the interview? If there are recorded interviews could Sheriff Leazenby be thinking back to recorded interview but can't place which one? A recorded phone tip?here is the strange thing.
“hi guys” to me sounds like a ringing voice.
“down the hill” is hollow.
These two characteristics almost never change, ringing voices are not perceived as hollow, and vice versa.
This is something I shall never explain, and it makes me wonder why I hear two different characteristics on the recording.
Obvious thing - if the recording (4 words) is useless to us, maybe the relatives won’t recognize it, too?
What TL means I can’t even fathom. He sounded like he knew who killed the girls in the beginning, about it being a shock for the community, etc..,
I see ppl living close to delphi saying they have never heard of the crime till recently ...thats reality ...unless locals or tru crime community...ppl wouldnt kno about it
I do not understand the fascination with wether or not the girls screamed or responded or said anything..and speculation over why we cant hear it..
of course they responded, does anyone believe they were silent and did this man's bidding?
for me it is extra information, superfluous and not relevant, will not change the outcome or tell us anything..and if it does reveal anything..they aren't going to tell us.
let's just assume they screamed , resisted etc, and were eventually subdued.
mOO
Most people don't scream; most people are frozen with fear. BG approached them in a stealthy manner; he didn't jump out of the bushes and chase them (which is the kind of attack that would be more likely to lead to screaming).That's the whole point in why some of us are fascinated. If they screamed or shouted, why did no one hear it? If they didn't, why not? Could mean a second person involved.
I did find where the info about a gun came from, a Gray Hughes video, which we're allowed to link.
Anna heard Abby say, "Is that a gun? He's got a gun". Then LE letting Anna look at and listen to the video said to her after BG says, "Down the hill"...did you hear that? That noise was a gun cocking.
The whole explanation if things Anna saw and heard starts at around 48:00 in. The gun talk starts at around 51:00.
Most people don't scream; most people are frozen with fear. BG approached them in a stealthy manner; he didn't jump out of the bushes and chase them (which is the kind of attack that would be more likely to lead to screaming).
That's what it seems doesn't it.So he's reading from a text message he got from someone who is telling him what they heard from Anna? Am I understanding correctly that's where this information has come from?
Q. Does this investigation need “new eyes”? What reason can you give to not change the investigative strategy?
A. New eyes frequently occur within the core of investigators. The ISP, FBI and we have consulted often with experts and other agencies to provided us with their evaluation of the investigation to this stage.
The ego narrative is ridiculous. They've clearly had no problem going to outside sources for help. Tobe admitted this. The FBI was there from day 1. The ISP, CCSO, FBI, GBI, and other out of state investigators have had a hand in this. Paul Holes was consulted and admitted they had a tough road a head of them. They literally changed an entire sketch 2 years after the murder. If that doesn't scream humility, I don't know what does. The anti LE rhetoric is tiring and distracting and this case has been nothing but a vehicle for people to grandstand on. Meanwhile, there are hundreds of youtubers disrupting the case with wild theories and accusations and countless others who don't have to face any consequences for their actions who seem to have an answer for everything until they have a different one. The same people telling LE how to investigate, or criticizing LE are the same people accusing a new person every week. The same people with a new theory every day. Because it's easy to voice your opinions, voice your accusations when you literally have zero accountability for the outcome and can just move on if you're wrong.
Meanwhile, there are hundreds of youtubers disrupting the case with wild theories and accusations and countless others who don't have to face any consequences for their actions who seem to have an answer for everything until they have a different one. The same people telling LE how to investigate, or criticizing LE are the same people accusing a new person every week. The same people with a new theory every day. Because it's easy to voice your opinions, voice your accusations when you literally have zero accountability for the outcome and can just move on if you're wrong.