I agree, but Deering can’t give too much time or the clock will run out jmo
AC's GOT THIS. JMO. I think she's got Junk on a shock collar, too.
I agree, but Deering can’t give too much time or the clock will run out jmo
I think Judge Deering will cut some slack to Angela Canepa. She's trying to manage 6 different cases going through trial right now against 12 defense attorneys. If she needs more time to finish discovery, he'll probably grant it.
It’s obvious where this is heading. The W’s attorneys most likely will be claiming they were framed just like originally thought. It is a shame that Reader and Junk are now giving them stuff to work with. Such a shame....
Does anyone think that certain people are trying to cover up details of the recent allegations of sex trafficking?
(I don't mean Reader, but others)
Reader is not giving "them" whoever that is...anything, IMO. He is standing his ground which he has always done. RJ reminds me of a little ole dog who can't swim anymore, so he's trying hard to tread water.
If you were picked to be on a Wagner jury, could you overlook the "dog who can't swim"? Or would it be hard to believe anything he says? Hummmm....
If you were picked to be on a Wagner jury, could you overlook the "dog who can't swim"? Or would it be hard to believe anything he says? Hummmm....
He (RJ) is not on trial for these 8 murders, so he would not in the least come into my decision. But I guarantee you, one whole terabyte of cold, hard murderous evidence against the 4 accused Wagners, definately would weigh hard on my decision. What about you??
Dudly, I can't open this. Who is that bizarre quote from? Someone is accusing the FBI with destroying some of FW's horses?Interesting replies.
"Besides her husband dying during that time and the FBI destroying many horses on her farm, she also was supposed to be digging through papers to get a bill? Wow!"
No worries, thanks.I meant it was his last hearing to date. All 4 are charged with murder and will have many more hearings before the trials begin. JMO. I apologize for the confusion.
Good God, can AC dump Junk and get someone else? That all sounds very ominous and like it could adversely affect the W trials if Junk stays on as prosecutor. IMO
Read what document?Lol, if you read page 4 of the document and who reported RC to Ross Sheriff, it was a SH who had her own reasons to blab about RC... came back to bite her right in the butt! Jealousy gets you nowhere.
Right! Dump him AC.If you were picked to be on a Wagner jury, could you overlook the "dog who can't swim"? Or would it be hard to believe anything he says? Hummmm....
You're right of course but...yes there unfortunately is a but...we all know, have seen how lawyer's and their personalities, their egos and even pathos can surely factor into a trial.I feel this deserves a second answer. Any jury member who is not basing their vote on pure evidence needs to be dismissed immediately. For God's sake, the jury members should never concentrate on the prosecution or defense attorneys!
With reader being investigated and also taking shots at junk saying “need to get rid of the junk in pike county” .. IMO both are a liability at this point.SAME THOUGHTS.
I personally have always felt Junk was soft on certain people and dismissed way too many charges in the past and that Junk gets away with it.
In my mind, Sheriff Reader has always seemed credible, ethical, passionate about Justice. I believe him.
Reader indicated he intends to expose Junk so help me God (paraphrasing). IMO Reader knows that there is corruption involving Junk that goes very deep in Ohio.
Junk and a few others in Ohio are trying their best to silence Reader because they're scared of being exposed.
Totally me speculating.