Thanks for the reply. Does this mean if something is found or has to be changed to a murder enquiry? As in it's out of anyone's hands it is just changed?
UK UK - Corrie McKeague, 23, Bury St Edmunds, 24 September 2016 #4
- Thread starter Greater Than
- Start date
- Status
Thanks for the reply. Does this mean if something is found or has to be changed to a murder enquiry? As in it's out of anyone's hands it is just changed?
Come on ! (just been to a traditional "Arabic" Sunday with friends...and alcohol as normal !) and after bottle numero "X" I can see it ....and you can.
#1 A camera was always on that area (for our benefit he said "at least one" so he reads here)
#2 And the "Silver Car" can be discounted.
You always use "two things" to confirm a point. He was in the Intelligence Corp ( Or was it "14th" ? He never said
! ) So the cameras "could see".
That leaves you with "Corrie didn't walk"
Leaves you with "three vehicles"
It is actually a very clever update.
Did he say the silver car could be discounted? Or did he say there's not need for speculation? I think I need a drink it's been a looong dayCome on ! (just been to a traditional "Arabic" Sunday with friends...and alcohol as normal !) and after bottle numero "X" I can see it ....and you can.
#1 A camera was always on that area (for our benefit he said "at least one" so he reads here)
#2 And the "Silver Car" can be discounted.
You always use "two things" to confirm a point. He was in the Intelligence Corp ( Or was it "14th" ? He never said
So the cameras "could see".
That leaves you with "Corrie didn't walk"
Leaves you with "three vehicles"
It is actually a very clever update.
I don't think they even need to find blood or clothing in order to change it to a suspected murder inquiry... look at the Claudia Lawrence case... no blood no clothing no body Nothing! But it is a murder inquiry.
cotswoldemmie
Active Member
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2016
- Messages
- 217
- Reaction score
- 37
Tonys quote "Investigations into the other 3 vehicles from the 'Horseshoe' continue. Speculation about them would not be helpful at this stage. There is no need to speculate further on a 'silver car' at this point either"
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Think shading. Or shadows.
Corrie never walked into the road.... he headed for "the corner near the bikes" is my guess.
No time is released for the vehicles. Was there a vehicle waiting ?
I'm not sure there was. Not in the loading bay.
bbyblueeyez
New Member
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2016
- Messages
- 292
- Reaction score
- 0
I need to say goodnight not been sleeping well getting daggers as ive been on here most of day lol but wanted to thank you for making a newbie feel welcomed and not biting my head off. I be back early hours for any new comments night night X
MidsummersDay
New Member
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2016
- Messages
- 1,194
- Reaction score
- 1
Do you have a link to that page please?
cotswoldemmie
Active Member
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2016
- Messages
- 217
- Reaction score
- 37
No problem, and welcome
TheTruthWillOut
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2011
- Messages
- 2,394
- Reaction score
- 2,456
Come on ! (just been to a traditional "Arabic" Sunday with friends...and alcohol as normal !) and after bottle numero "X" I can see it ....and you can.
#1 A camera was always on that area (for our benefit he said "at least one" so he reads here)
#2 And the "Silver Car" can be discounted.
You always use "two things" to confirm a point. He was in the Intelligence Corp ( Or was it "14th" ? He never said
So the cameras "could see".
That leaves you with "Corrie didn't walk"
Leaves you with "three vehicles"
It is actually a very clever update.
So they've solved the case then? Corrie walked in, left the area in one of the three vehicles, all vehicles identified. Done!
So why no arrest and why will there be CCTV appeals in the coming week for a man and other people?
If I'm reading your post wrong please feel free to dumb it down for me....
So we're back to he's waiting. And we can reasonably assess he's gone before the bin lorry arrived. Not a huge window.
So they've solved the case then? Corrie walked in, left the area in one of the three vehicles, all vehicles identified. Done!
So why no arrest and why will there be CCTV appeals in the coming week for a man and other people?
If I'm reading your post wrong please feel free to dumb it down for me....
If they suspect any of the three vehicles (which they should) they need to test and interview all drivers and persons who had access to the car. They'd need to connect Corrie to a vehicle somehow. It's not enough to say they were there. This will take time, more so as they will want to corroborate said events with evidence from cctv etc.
The unidentified people are important as you cannot see into the bay. They could be entering/exiting vehicles or involved in any way/witnesses, identifying them matters.
cotswoldemmie
Active Member
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2016
- Messages
- 217
- Reaction score
- 37
So they've solved the case then? Corrie walked in, left the area in one of the three vehicles, all vehicles identified. Done!
So why no arrest and why will there be CCTV appeals in the coming week for a man and other people?
If I'm reading your post wrong please feel free to dumb it down for me....
So would I be right in thinking that Tonys repeated use of the phrase, in all (correct me if I'm wrong) updates "Corrie was not seen leaving on foot" actually means "but we have seen him leaving in your car"? Or have I completely got this wrong?
Which would then lead me to also ask, why no arrest?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Look.... the attacker/killer/kidnapper knows who did this.
And "before" it may have been "beneficial" to keep the number of cars and people seen "private".
Why ? Because it distracts people that may be able to help from helping.
Key is.
# Corrie leaving was not seen
# Cars leaving were (so they had to enter. You can't leave, if you did not enter).
Proof is for fine whisky and judges !
You can't change the status of an enquiry without proof.
The "proof" is so far "circumstantial" if that.
And "before" it may have been "beneficial" to keep the number of cars and people seen "private".
Why ? Because it distracts people that may be able to help from helping.
Key is.
# Corrie leaving was not seen
# Cars leaving were (so they had to enter. You can't leave, if you did not enter).
Proof is for fine whisky and judges !
You can't change the status of an enquiry without proof.
The "proof" is so far "circumstantial" if that.
SOMETHINGWILLDO
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2016
- Messages
- 353
- Reaction score
- 941
I love your inputs on here, everything always makes more sense!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'd say so.
But "who" can anyone arrest, if you can't find the car ?
Comes back to "why was he waiting".
An us Intelligent guys didn't even clean boots !
(at least I hope your comment was "sincere" !)
It's been really interesting how the information has been drip fed so far. This started out as a "vanished" scenario and we have progressed from "vanished" to "vehicles and people entering and exiting the area in the timeframe" this time 6 weeks ago it would have been inconceivable that there was anything of significance on cctv except the bin lorry.
- Status