Holdontoyourhat
Former Member
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2005
- Messages
- 5,299
- Reaction score
- 12
I don't think RDI has adequately explained the advantage vs disadvantage of including a ransom note in the accident coverup scenario. Simply stating that the killers mind works in wacky ways, is a blank check explanation that would satisfy any crime scene phenomenon.
Obviously the killer's intention was to not get caught. This he has been effective at for over 12 years. The evidence tells us that neither JBR's murder nor the killer's ability to not get caught are accidents. There's no dumb luck going on. Thats just a claim.
There was one perp's handwriting posted on a billboard in Florida, and the perp was caught. In another case, investigators poured thru thousands of suspect documents and found a handwriting match to an existing ransom note. The match was dead ringer and led to a conviction.
Linguistics from Kaczynski's manifesto were recognized by family members.
"Over two decades, a mail bomber, known only as the Unabomber, killed three people and injured 29 with exploding packages. As the investigation progressed, family members of Ted Kaczynski recognized similarities between his writings and the Unabomber’s Manifesto. When the FBI collected samples of Ted’s writing their experts came to the same conclusion.
Many of the samples included unusual sentence structures such as “you can’t eat your cake and have it, too,” a convoluted version of the commonly used saying “you can’t have your cake and eat it too.” Ultimately, a judge agreed with the analysis and issued a search warrant for Kaczynski’s cabin where agents discovered bomb-making materials."
IDI should ask the question: How does JBR ransom note author's handwriting AND linguistics elude everybody, not just LE but the public also, for 12 years?
Obviously the killer's intention was to not get caught. This he has been effective at for over 12 years. The evidence tells us that neither JBR's murder nor the killer's ability to not get caught are accidents. There's no dumb luck going on. Thats just a claim.
There was one perp's handwriting posted on a billboard in Florida, and the perp was caught. In another case, investigators poured thru thousands of suspect documents and found a handwriting match to an existing ransom note. The match was dead ringer and led to a conviction.
Linguistics from Kaczynski's manifesto were recognized by family members.
"Over two decades, a mail bomber, known only as the Unabomber, killed three people and injured 29 with exploding packages. As the investigation progressed, family members of Ted Kaczynski recognized similarities between his writings and the Unabomber’s Manifesto. When the FBI collected samples of Ted’s writing their experts came to the same conclusion.
Many of the samples included unusual sentence structures such as “you can’t eat your cake and have it, too,” a convoluted version of the commonly used saying “you can’t have your cake and eat it too.” Ultimately, a judge agreed with the analysis and issued a search warrant for Kaczynski’s cabin where agents discovered bomb-making materials."
IDI should ask the question: How does JBR ransom note author's handwriting AND linguistics elude everybody, not just LE but the public also, for 12 years?