Just my take on it. Maybe LE collected evidence from the crime scene that at the time seemed to contradict the witness for YBG sketch. Or the witness contradicted the video. Or the witness wasn't reliable. There could be a million reasons.
So they sat on it, not wanting to put something out that might be wrong.
Along comes witness number two, a few months later, with information that fit a little better. OBG sketch. After all, haven't many of us thought it looked more like the video? Plus they used various other information, maybe including the video, or the profile. We don't know that part.
I'm going to go out on a limb and guess that neither witness description fits the evidence found at the CS perfectly, so while they have a composite, it's only one element of many that quantify a suspect. JMO
So they sat on it, not wanting to put something out that might be wrong.
Along comes witness number two, a few months later, with information that fit a little better. OBG sketch. After all, haven't many of us thought it looked more like the video? Plus they used various other information, maybe including the video, or the profile. We don't know that part.
I'm going to go out on a limb and guess that neither witness description fits the evidence found at the CS perfectly, so while they have a composite, it's only one element of many that quantify a suspect. JMO
Last edited: