Interesting on the witness list there is a botanist specializing in the areas rare plants.
Really? I hadn't noticed that.
Many rare plant species have an extremely small range, and occur nowhere else. Plant material collected from someone's tires, shoes, etc can sometimes be identified and used to trace where they have been down to a surprisingly small area.
Would they put someone on the list that hasn't led anywhere yet? (IOW hasn't led to usable evidence) ?
ETA - I understand witnesses saying yes that's from our video camera. I mean 'professionals' that do analysis for a living.
Would they put someone on the list that hasn't led anywhere yet? (IOW hasn't led to usable evidence) ?
ETA - I understand witnesses saying yes that's from our video camera. I mean 'professionals' that do analysis for a living.
i love how forensic specialists are going to show Tee just how misguided her attempts to destroy, remove and tamper with evidence was. The scope and intricacies of the field is insane, thinking you are clever enough to completely cover your tracks is hubris at its best.Interesting on the witness list there is a botanist specializing in the areas rare plants.
Thanks for explaining. I’ve been confused too.We certainly are not sure of anything at all.
All we have is a description of the clothes she said he was wearing when he ran away from home.
Those are not the same clothes we saw he was wearing when he entered that vehicle for the last time.
The rest are all social media rumors.
No evidence has been produced by LE and most likely will not be until trial, though maybe arrest affidavits will contain some, certainly not close to all.
There was speculation that she may have disposed of the clothes he wore on Sunday, she may well have, because they were similar to the description of the clothes she said he wore when running away. But we all saw he wore a track suit legs on his last journey.Thanks for explaining. I’ve been confused too.
ITA particularly your last paragraph. I think she has simply been lucky so far as to finding his body. I think she has been given way to much credit for this being premeditated or thought out. She simply was lucky as to where she put him.i love how forensic specialists are going to show Tee just how misguided her attempts to destroy, remove and tamper with evidence was. The scope and intricacies of the field is insane, thinking you are clever enough to completely cover your tracks is hubris at its best.
i like comments by Joe Kenda about how very few people get away with murder because of their intellect and planning, that evhe truth comes out, even if its years later... he said the majority that don't get caught just got lucky.
GM, does anyone sleep around hereThere was speculation that she may have disposed of the clothes he wore on Sunday, she may well have, because they were similar to the description of the clothes she said he wore when running away. But we all saw he wore a track suit legs on his last journey.
The rumor of the soiled clothes found was a social media rumor, there were soiled clothes allegedly found with some rubber gloves but they were never confirmed to be his...
Not a single word uttered by Ls was ever confirmed as truth.
I have no idea when the arrest affidavit will become unsealed or what it will contain.
But, I imagine every word will be accurate and fully backed up with forensic evidence.
Until then, we just need to sit it out and it's not easy.
Thanks Pink.
I know! Its 10.45 am in the UK but I think we are all awake all hours on WSGM, does anyone sleep around here
I don't know about others but I do know I never lost so much sleep on any case ever.GM, does anyone sleep around here
Haven't posted in a while because of work but have been following this case very closely. Finally have more time to discuss on here!
I hate even asking this question or typing this out, and this is purely a speculative question. What kind of evidence can be found to prove that one is deceased, without a doubt, yet it isn't a body? I would like to know the possibilities. I know one can be a large amount of blood that can be proven that the person could not survive with the amount of blood loss, but what else? What evidence do you guys think has been found thus far proving that he is no longer with us?
If this is too much of a "touchy" subject I apologize and will be happy to delete. I am merely curious; I personally don't know all that much about forensics, etc.
Of course, wishing for a peace that passes understanding for the family. That Press Release with Landen speaking absolutely broke me and I can't imagine what they are going through. I am confident that little Gannon is watching over them from above and that justice will be served in this case.
Haven't posted in a while because of work but have been following this case very closely. Finally have more time to discuss on here!
I hate even asking this question or typing this out, and this is purely a speculative question. What kind of evidence can be found to prove that one is deceased, without a doubt, yet it isn't a body? I would like to know the possibilities. I know one can be a large amount of blood that can be proven that the person could not survive with the amount of blood loss, but what else? What evidence do you guys think has been found thus far proving that he is no longer with us?
If this is too much of a "touchy" subject I apologize and will be happy to delete. I am merely curious; I personally don't know all that much about forensics, etc.
Of course, wishing for a peace that passes understanding for the family. That Press Release with Landen speaking absolutely broke me and I can't imagine what they are going through. I am confident that little Gannon is watching over them from above and that justice will be served in this case.
I don't know about others but I do know I never lost so much sleep on any case ever.