kaen
Trying to be a good human.
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2014
- Messages
- 6,681
- Reaction score
- 48,470
That Bruce Isackson guy has some extra charges - "Conspiracy to commit mail fraud and honest services mail fraud; money laundering conspiracy; and conspiracy to defraud the United States"
*facepalm* Yeah I think that goes for pretty much everyone who's facing punishment for illegal acts. Safe to say there's prisons full of people who wouldn't have done what they did if they knew they'd get caught.
Does Olivia Jade actually think that statement makes her look good?!
All MOO/JMO
That Bruce Isackson guy has some extra charges - "Conspiracy to commit mail fraud and honest services mail fraud; money laundering conspiracy; and conspiracy to defraud the United States"
From the link:
"But Paperny said the most important conversations he's had with many are about accepting responsibility, which he believes can lead to a more lenient sentence.
'I would encourage defendants, any defendants, if they broke the law to own it, to acknowledge it, to run not walk towards taking a plea agreement,' Paperny said. 'Those that respond more appropriately should get better prison sentences.'"
Looks like several defendants are taking that approach - admit responsibility and display remorse.
Will be interesting if Lori and Mossimo will pay attention to that advice.
jmo
There are a couple of them that have multiple charges. I find it interesting that they are pleading so quickly. The prosecuting team must be thrilled to have them rolling.
In the document I linked, there are people with cooperation agreements as well as plea agreements.
I find this very interesting, "Mail Fraud" was the major charge against most of the accused. So, if they had not used USPS for mailing the untruthful college applications there wouldn't be any charges? Is that the crux of the matter? I don't understand the "mail fraud" tie in...that seems to be reaching quite a bit with the law.
I understand the bribery issue, but it appears that the "bribes" don't have the same legal ramifications as the mail fraud charges.
Mail fraud is not just a USPS "payment or action by mail" fraud. The definition has changed over the course of time. (Maybe it Should Just Be Called Federal Fraud: The Changing Nature of the Mail Fraud Statute by Peter J. Henning :: SSRN) and (Mail and wire fraud - Wikipedia)
Interesting article. But in the end, the essential element of the crime that must be proven without a doubt, is the use of mail, or other carrier to perpetrate the fraud.
Just throwing this out there...if the application was done online, with a credit card, that throws out a major crux/charge in the case. No proof of mail fraud.
My daughter applied for college, and she did everything online, including uploading documents. Even the SAT scores were accessed by a computer code. Everything was done electronically. Even the fees were paid with a credit card (significantly less than $500,000).
If there was no use of mail in the application process, a major part of the case is gone. This may be why some people are not taking a plea.
That Bruce Isackson guy has some extra charges - "Conspiracy to commit mail fraud and honest services mail fraud; money laundering conspiracy; and conspiracy to defraud the United States"
Not sure if TMZ is considered a very legitimate news source, but....
Lori Loughlin Offered 2 Years Minimum Prison Sentence in Plea Negotiations
If I'm judging them as a family, where is William H. Macy's statement admitting his guilt or will he only be sorry too if they have enough evidence to bring him to trial.
I feel sorry for their daughter if she didn't know but seriously how did she not know something was up if she was suddenly diagnosed with a learning difficulty and took the test offsite
I think Felicity's daughter knew she was getting some extra help and a nudge to make her scores better. I don't think she knew it was illegal. Just my hunch.I read through the charges for Felicity and I think her daughter had to know. I think she's saying her daughter had no clue just to try to save some of her daughter's reputation.
Her daughter had her test "proctored" by the test taker guy from Florida and took it over 2 days and score went up 400 points. I'm guessing she went from 1000 to 1400.
I know with some of the charges the test taker guy actually changed answers after the fact but I don't think that's what happened here. Their version of proctoring sounds like "if you're not sure on one of the answers let me know and I'll talk you through it".
There was one of the other kids that wasn't even at the testing center on the 2nd test day when they pulled cellphone records. I forget which one that was but I found it when I first read through the list of charges when it came out. My guess is well over half of these kids knew something was up even if they didn't know the major details behind it and that large amounts of money were involved.