Not sure why you tried to take my words out of context but is all fine.
I suppose in the end, we have a missing child. Whether in China, Papua New Guinea or Tanzania leaving three kids by themselves when parents go party may not seem to be a big deal, nevertheless the fact remains the same:
Because of it, we have a toddler missing.
I didn't do the bolding above, but I agree it is the most important part of the post.
First, if the parents are responsible for Madeleine's disappearance, it isn't
"Because of it" - leaving the children alone. If the parents "did it", Madeleine would have been demised BEFORE the parents selfishly left their children alone to go out and party with their friends.
Secondly, if Maddie was abducted, I believe the abductor (the one doing the abducting) is at fault. "How so?" you may ask. Because he/she took someone else's child without their permission and that's against the law. Maddie isn't missing
"Because of it" , she's missing because a
criminal took her. How many cases have we seen in recent years where children have been taken when the parents were at home? Elizabeth Smart is a good example and there are lots of others. No child is missing
Because of it , they're missing because some
criminal stole/kidnapped/abducted that child and broke the laws of God and man.
Think, if you will, about a rape victim. Remember when people said, "She was asking for it by wearing a dress like that?" That mind set was taking the responsibility off the rapist and putting it on the victim. I see the same thing happening in this case - the victims being victimized and, until proven otherwise, Madeleine and the McCanns are victims.
Madeleine isn't missing
Because of it , she's missing because someone illegally took her or she was dead prior to
it .