He did do a geat job at that, but why? Should we applaud the Pros in an instance like this, I don't think so. The Defense should be able to see what was produced by the FBI tool so they can cross and defend their client. This may be one murder case, but bottom line it sets precedent that could at some time affect someone you know, or an innocent person. We can't just because we want one person to be guilty that it is ok to give up a few rights this one time, when we do that then there is always another time and before we know it it is law.
He also did a great job of saying to the same Durham LEO, so he looked at this map 12 hours before she was murdered, which is not fact, and the Durham LE said yes. I really don't think that was appropriate and Defense should have objected, maybe they did, we can't hear.
Well, I think the judge doesn't understand what Kurtz wants and Zell either does or is skirting the issue. I don't know why they can't show the final print out. And btw, I was merely pointing out my opinion. I haven't applauded anybody. IMO, we will see this case in appeals court if BC is convicted. Whether right or wrong, I think that will be the case You can think of this as two teams playing ball with the judge officiating the game and call decisions. Both sides will make their points any way possible. I have seen the attorneys fight like dogs with each other and then after court, they will be chatting like best friends. SOmehow that image of the defense and prosecution doesn't seem to fit.