But I didn't see Swatperp filled with rage. Why not? Was it because this person really didn't have a tie to her and was hired to do the killing or was this person just cold stone.......evil?
Sent from my SM-J700T using Tapatalk
We watched a calm, cool, individual whose sole focus and intention was to murder Missy and escape without any notice.
We know there were flings, a few of them. Some rock both ways. That is where the danger was for MB.
I do think SP attempted to stop MB from going to Austin that weekend. She needed to: stop all of the CG stuff, quit sexing and sinning, before she died. MB went to CG in Austin anyway. And she died as a result.
ID had a show of a married lady who meticulously planned a once in a lifetime bucket list cruise so she would have a perfect alibi when her husband met his unfortunate demise. $4mm in insurance. People really do try successfully to give themselves the perfect alibi, when plotting a felony murder.
ALIBIS are crucial in a murder investigation. Isn't the husband always the first one suspected when his wife is murdered? Perhaps someone did it for him, without him knowing, until it was a done deed.
Whatever happened to her family, the Strickland's, speaking to a reporter soon? Is that interview still on the table? BB was quick to inform us to watch for it.
Bless the beast and the children :rose:
I'm hearing there have been reassignments in the detective division at MPD. Does anyone know if true and which detectives are no longer working on murder cases? TIA
I went backand in retrospect believe that she was right on one of the issues and probablywrong on the other. Reviewing the reactionof the husband and father-in-law. I nowagree with her that the reactions do appear to warrant further review in thatdirection. My argument was thateveryone responds to difficult situations differently. But I now agree with her that they do notreflect normal reactions to a brutally murdered and mutilated family member.
Did someone - maybe younger person with accomplices - think to save one of the marriages (NOT necessarily the B.'s marriage)???
This killer had a disguise that hid their identity from the surveillance cameras. I would never have thought of such a disguise. I would have worn something such as all black with a ski mask or military camouflage with a ski mask. The SWAT uniform may have caused Missy to pause if it had police on the front and the killer told her not to move.
Regarding the surveillance camera's that still makes me believe the killer had been at the church before and seen the cameras. What puzzles me is how well known was it that the OUTSIDE cameras were not working? The killer could have worn the full disguise to the car and took the headgear off when inside, but an outside camera would have captured the car and possibly the plates. Either this person did some really good planning or they were extremely lucky.
We watched a calm, cool, individual whose sole focus and intention was to murder Missy and escape without any notice.
We know there were flings, a few of them. Some rock both ways. That is where the danger was for MB.
I do think SP attempted to stop MB from going to Austin that weekend. She needed to: stop all of the CG stuff, quit sexing and sinning, before she died. MB went to CG in Austin anyway. And she died as a result.
ID had a show of a married lady who meticulously planned a once in a lifetime bucket list cruise so she would have a perfect alibi when her husband met his unfortunate demise. $4mm in insurance. People really do try successfully to give themselves the perfect alibi, when plotting a felony murder.
ALIBIS are crucial in a murder investigation. Isn't the husband always the first one suspected when his wife is murdered? Perhaps someone did it for him, without him knowing, until it was a done deed.
Whatever happened to her family, the Strickland's, speaking to a reporter soon? Is that interview still on the table? BB was quick to inform us to watch for it.
Bless the beast and the children :rose:
Random middle of the night thought, but on Randy Bever's wife's FB page, her post about her little dog getting killed the week after Missy was killed got more comments and reactions than her post on Missy being murdered.
I *really* feel there was a very pervasive feeling of "Missy got what she deserved" among this family.
I know we've all gone back and fourth as to whether SP is a man or woman, I definitely think it's a woman. They have some really feminine mannerisms. But just watching the video again now, I noticed after sp leaves those double doors and carries on to the next door trying to get into it, that sp foot is half raised with their heel in the air. To me that is extremely feminine.
Put me down for the "female" option as well. To me, the gait is not only feminine, but also not particularly athletic. Rather, she seems to be trudging under the weight of the Swat stuff, and also seems to be "heavy" on her feet.
About the license plate that was over-exposed on the surveillance video: some electronic light tables (ELT) have options for pulling data out of the source medium. For example, Remote View is an one such exploitation system. Remote View is often used for GIS (Geographic Information System) work, where people used satellite imagery to do mapping and other related services. Remote View has false color options to pull background information from imagery -- imagery that is very much like the surveillance footage that was over-exposed.
If a Webslueths member does GIS work in their day job, I'm wondering if it is possible to get a clean copy of the surveillance tape and do data manipulation on the license plate portion? Most law enforcement probably aren't that adept on the extent to which an electronic image can be manipulated to extract information from the data layers. GIS is specialized enough that college-level masters programs are offered in it.
I would think this suggestion would have more usefulness if made directly to the MPD rather than soliciting it done here.
1 MPD already has unlimited access to the raw data that you suggest to be manipulated (and may not want to give that to anyone else)
2 Even if they don't personally have the expertise for this sort of work, they could hire it done by an expert of the highest caliber if they feel it's worth the effort.
3 In addition, they would know a couple of key things that we don't (and which would impact such a project), which is whether they have already located said car, and whether they feel it matters in any way.
Call them or email them, if you think they need this.
I am sure they did, but I hope they reviewed footage for several weeks before and watched for anyone looking around more than usual and watched for similar gait. Just in normal times. Not alone in the middle of the night, obviously.
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
No. I meant the church. It's just seems like they have been there before. I hope something happens soon. It was such a brutal ambush that has video footage. It needs to be solved.You would think LE would obtain the video footage for as far back as the church maintains it. (I certainly hope so anyway.) I'm wondering how far back they can go. Video systems have several factors that limit storage capacity beyond the hard drive size. How many cameras, how many frames per second or minute and if the camera only records when a motion sensor detects movement. I believe in this case I read the cameras were motion activated which means they can store more days of history. If were doing surveillance on this church, though, the latest I would have visited would have been Easter (27 March) and I don't know if the video might go back that far. Easter would have been when the church would have likely had a very large attendance including those who don't attend regularly or come as visitors. A person could have come then with the least chance of drawing attention to themselves as not being a regular. This is assuming this was planned that well, of course.
If you're referring to the gun store, then that is a different item altogether. I can imagine their system goes quite a ways back as far as history.