Was Burke Involved? #6

Discussion in 'JonBenet Ramsey' started by Tricia, Dec 28, 2016.

  1. Tricia

    Tricia Owner Websleuths.com Staff Member Administrator Moderator

    Messages:
    27,652
    Likes Received:
    36,249
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Welcome to thread # 5 of "Was Burke Involved?"

    It will be interesting to read how many of you have changed your opinion of Burke after watching two out of the three interviews with Burke and Dr. Phil.

    What a lot of people came away with (myself included) is how in the world could Lin Wood or John Ramsey allow Burke to be interviewed?

    Burke is an adult so perhaps there was nothing they could do to stop him. However, I got the impression that Burke would rather be anywhere else in the world than with Dr. Phil answering questions.

    Continue posting and thank you for participating.

    Tricia

    Was Burke Involved ? # 1


    Was Burke Involved ? # 2

    Was Burke Involved? # 3

    Was Burke Involved? # 4

    Thread #5
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Feb 26, 2021
    Diogeneszenodude and DeDee like this.


  2. proust20

    proust20 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    182
    Likes Received:
    294
    Trophy Points:
    63
    In Kolar's FF, there is a photograph of the torn Christmas presents on page 340 (photo 27). According to the caption, the wrapping is the same as on the the children's presents as seen in the Christmas day pictures, which I take to mean as being the FAO Schwarz wrapping. There is also shown the unwrapped Lego set supposedly meant for BR's birthday.
    Given PR's lack of credibility, her claim that she was the one who tore the wrapping can be dismissed readily. Kolar states that BR tore the paper on Christmas Day. Therefore, it can be inferred that PR was once again trying to distance BR from being in the basement.
    Assuming that the presents in the WC are part of the staging, I am once again puzzled by the point of arranging them there. What about this suggests a kidnapping gone wrong? A way to reconcile this confusion is to think of the staging as a disorganized effort. The Rs could have been changing their minds as they did it, or different people may have been responsible for various aspects of the staging.
    Also, as the Lego set is unwrapped, how could BR be surprised when receiving it later in January? Since his train room was in the basement, he'd have come across it easily.
     
    Cottonstar and Herlock5 like this.
  3. UKGuy

    UKGuy Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    10,528
    Likes Received:
    2,758
    Trophy Points:
    113
    proust20,
    Exactly.

    Well put, now Kolar hints that Burke opened the gifts intended for Patsy's niece Jenny, i.e. size-12's?

    Now does it matter how these were wrapped, e.g. FAO Schwarz wrapping, Bloomingdale's wrapping, Other Christmas Themed wrapping?

    Kolar is implying Burke knew about the size-12's long before they set out for the White's Christmas party, along with all the other gifts?

    I reckon its not so much the gifts are in the wine-cellar as part of the staging, but that they are not say in JonBenet's bedroom, they were likely dumped in the wine-cellar to break any links to upstairs along with a cover story about Burke's birthday?

    How about JonBenet opening Burke's gifts and he goes postal over this?

    .
     
    dgfred likes this.
  4. Herlock5

    Herlock5 Active Member

    Messages:
    32
    Likes Received:
    164
    Trophy Points:
    33
    Put this together with the pineapple evidence and it becomes more and more clear.
     
  5. Chocopops

    Chocopops Member

    Messages:
    96
    Likes Received:
    46
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Do you have the source for Patsy having claimed to have been the one who tore the wrapping? Thanks.
     
  6. UKGuy

    UKGuy Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    10,528
    Likes Received:
    2,758
    Trophy Points:
    113
    In the following excerpt Patsy is viewing crime-scene photographs of the wine-cellar and answering related questions.

    Chocopops,

    June 1998 Patsy Ramsey Interrogation by Thomas Haney and Trip DeMuth
    Note John in an earlier account states that Patsy did not know anything about the gifts in the wine-cellar, i.e. only John did.

    James Kolar in his book that Burke Ramsey opened the gifts:
    James Kolar, Foreign Faction, Excerpt
    So there you go. It was Burke, John and Patsy who opened the gifts?

    All different accounts, which raises the question: if the Ramsey version of events is kosher then why do they all claim to have opened the gifts?

    IMO, the opened gifts are like the size-12's, a red flag!

    .
     
    Razz, dgfred and Chocopops like this.
  7. Chocopops

    Chocopops Member

    Messages:
    96
    Likes Received:
    46
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Thanks UKGuy
     
  8. Swirlz

    Swirlz Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    14,278
    Likes Received:
    6,881
    Trophy Points:
    113
    [AMAA ANNOUNCEMENT] James Kolar on Saturday, March 6th @ 11 AM MST
     
  9. Tadpole12

    Tadpole12 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    7,724
    Likes Received:
    11,751
    Trophy Points:
    113
    "For the occasion, Chief Kolar has given us permission to share with you his newly released commentary on the Grand Jury indictments. This is an update that was meant to go into the second edition of Foreign Faction, which Chief Kolar currently has no plans to publish. It discusses the 1999 grand jury indictments of John and Patsy Ramsey which were not made public until 2013."

    Afterword, Grand Jury indictment, pdf:
    Afterword I Feb162021.pdf
     
    Last edited: Feb 26, 2021
  10. Rain on my Parade

    Rain on my Parade Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    495
    Likes Received:
    857
    Trophy Points:
    93
    It’s a real shame the conclusion Kolar came to. I have voiced the same conclusion in this case.
    Does this mean we are here merely to speculate. Looks like it.
     
    Tadpole12 likes this.
  11. tiddermod

    tiddermod New Member

    Messages:
    8
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    3
  12. UKGuy

    UKGuy Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    10,528
    Likes Received:
    2,758
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Rain on my Parade,
    No, because we can uncover the truth.

    Note where Kolar refers to two jurors telling Charlie Brennan that the parents had been hit with a Child Abuse Count.

    This process of revelation will simply multiply into the future. Kolar must be thinking along these lines as his analysis of LHP's attempts to publish her story suggests.

    I reckon LHP's story will eventually be published even if its postmortem or via kindle publishing.

    With Kolars latest remarks it appears the case is BDI, else why would the courts continue with sealing evidence, etc.

    We all know the parents were hit with GJ Counts, so if one unsigned Count was Murder In The First Degree, why can we not all see that?

    The clue lies with Kolars footnote on this subject:
    Afterword, Ventus Publishing, 2021 Excerpt
    Above BBM: Now for JonBenet afficionados the important word there is unindicted.

    Which I suspect must mean both parents were hit with Murder In The First Degree, as they formed part of a conspiracy to evade detection, e.g. Count VII, Accessory to a crime

    This explains why both parents had similar counts?

    The case being BDI explains why it was never going to court and why Hunter did what he did, along with all the other lukewarm interviews undertaken by BPD investigators, they knew the case was going nowhere?

    Kolar has read up on much of the case evidence including the GJ testimony, so his opinion on many fronts are really facts he cannot claim as such, due to his legal duty of non-disclosure.

    We should all support Kolar in his efforts, make sure his book is well known as this will encourage him to reveal more nuggets of information as time passes, and will secure Justice for JonBenet.

    .
     
  13. root661

    root661 Active Member

    Messages:
    48
    Likes Received:
    132
    Trophy Points:
    33
    I believe this is also why the GJ member who spoke out also says that despite his belief that "they" (the GJ) believe they know what happened he didn't believe that Alex Hunter could get a conviction. Conviction or not, the truth should be told for JonBenet and for all those that have been falsely accused or sued by the Ramsey machine.
     
    Mimsy2, David Rogers and Tadpole12 like this.
  14. UKGuy

    UKGuy Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    10,528
    Likes Received:
    2,758
    Trophy Points:
    113
    root661,
    Yes, but possibly what the GJ member did not know was that the GJ was simply being used as the assumed safest way of engineering the case through the legal justice system, so ending up with a pre-planned outcome. Just MO?

    This is why I post. Many folks were flung under the bus by the Ramsey's, consider LHP, poor woman and her family were left bereft by the Ramsey accusations.

    So the truth should be told. We can all make a contribution to this process by cataloging the facts and publishing them on the internet.

    The case will not go away, evidently more GJ Members will come forward, they will do interviews on the talk shows, witnesses will want their testimony to be heard, not that of the Ramsey's, so there is much more to come.

    ,
     
  15. Rain on my Parade

    Rain on my Parade Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    495
    Likes Received:
    857
    Trophy Points:
    93
    UKGuy,
    What is the event that will get the wheels turning?
     
    Tadpole12 likes this.
  16. Tadpole12

    Tadpole12 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    7,724
    Likes Received:
    11,751
    Trophy Points:
    113
    ^JR's passing?
     
    icedtea4me likes this.
  17. Tadpole12

    Tadpole12 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    7,724
    Likes Received:
    11,751
    Trophy Points:
    113
  18. Rain on my Parade

    Rain on my Parade Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    495
    Likes Received:
    857
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Tadpole12,
    And perhaps his public defender?
     
    Tadpole12 likes this.
  19. UKGuy

    UKGuy Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    10,528
    Likes Received:
    2,758
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Rain on my Parade,

    One of two events:

    1. As Tadpole12 suggests John Ramsey passes on?

    2. A GJ Juror or BPD case investigator is charged with illegal disclosure of sealed information, thus sparking a media storm and prompting witnesses currently sitting on the fence to come forward, so breaking the case?

    John Ramsey can simply replace Lin Wood with any other suitable attorney.

    .
     
    Tadpole12 likes this.
  20. Rain on my Parade

    Rain on my Parade Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    495
    Likes Received:
    857
    Trophy Points:
    93
    UKGuy,
    Replacing LW is a given. What will happen to a Grand Juror and BPD investigators should they decide to be charged with illegal disclosure?
     
    Tadpole12 likes this.

Share This Page



  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice