Marulinka
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2019
- Messages
- 144
- Reaction score
- 1,008
IMO that has always been my thinking - he told the police that he had picked her up to take her home, but she came on to him and they went to the park and had consensual sex on the bench and then she ran off and he never saw her again. I think he told them that tale from the very beginning once he knew they had the spidercam footage of her getting in his car and him driving off. I also think they didn’t have evidence to disprove what he said even though they knew it was rubbish and they knew exactly what he had done. They were so lucky finding her body that day before she disappeared forever, but of course we don’t know what they have found from the post mortem. I don’t think he has confessed and I also don’t think they have found the people they asked for from CCTV. I think they believe they have enough evidence to persuade a jury of his guilt and get a conviction. Well I hope so anyway. I am guessing he will plead not guilty, force a trial and then we will see what his story is of that night and also what the police knew that we didn’t. I always believed he had killed her from the very beginning, but didn’t know how it could be proved. I really hope it can be.
Those who thought he didn’t act alone, do you still think that or are you now satisfied he did do this alone?
Very sensible theory. What are your thoughts on how he killed her and how the body got all the way to estuary?
From the beginning i thought he acted alone. I stand by that still. Purely based on nature of his previous offending and the Libby case circumstances. Small possibility someone helped dispose of body but my guess is no.
Btw it sounds incredibely harsh talking about the poor angel in such an impersonal manner. Just want to say her tragedy touched me deepely. First case i followed here on WS. It brought me here. May justice be served :.(