ilovechili
Where is the wiKKed witch? Will Oct. bring her?
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2018
- Messages
- 4,388
- Reaction score
- 32,454
BBMFF:
If by heckuva case you mean the limpest biscuit ever (half)baked, then I agree.
The defense has one heckuva case to try to make.
I don't think PF and his defense attorney have a solid leg to stand on, which is going to make it well nigh to impossible for them to mount anything, like a case.
PF's mounting days are over.
The conclusions that some are comfortable with reaching at this point are not based on assumptions. They are based on known facts of the case. We have learned a lot of the evidence. We have seen warrants, and heard what was presented at the pc hearing.
DA May didn't enter "assumptions" into court. He presented evidence.
It is not "naive" to reach conclusions based on known facts, nor is it "tunnel vision" to recognize and identify key pieces of evidence in a case, and to assemble those pieces into a logical whole.
There are so many posters here who have a really impressive ability to mentally sort, sift, assimilate, and assemble facts. A lot of the posters here on this thread have superb analytical skills and lightning-quick mental processing speed. That doesn't mean they're making assumptions or employing "tunnel vision."
JMO.
Excuse me, I do not agree it will work or will not upset the jury.
I simply stated that a defense will use things in all areas and will put up a case and simply showed respect for the opinion that a defense will do their job. I doubt it will work. However, I can see them looking at everything. I do not even agree but have no reason not to respect someone else's opinion.
<modsnipped unnecessary comment>
Meant with all due respect and jmo.
Last edited by a moderator: