Amster
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2005
- Messages
- 11,584
- Reaction score
- 4,444
Could someone give me a brief synopsis to how Jersey became an issue again?
I think because of Joe T. and some neighbors wanting to be on TV? Just my opinion....
Could someone give me a brief synopsis to how Jersey became an issue again?
Could someone give me a brief synopsis to how Jersey became an issue again?
I think the reporter that is digging in and doing some investigative reporting is getting to the bottom of a lot we have not known... If this neighbor saw Jersey and MW in her 'hood' on a daily basis I am more inclined to think she is more than just an 'eye witness' as this is a person she claims to have seen on a regular basis.
the fact that the description and times fit with other eyewitness testimony (which can tend to be not so credible) makes it more interesting to me however.
moo
JVM:
-We know maternal uncle-DB's brother is not the person carrying the baby>doesn't fit t description
-We know Jersey is NOT the person who was carrying t child in t dead of night cause witness did not identify him
Could someone give me a brief synopsis to how Jersey became an issue again?
or three, lol. I give up, reading too much and my mind is all tangled up now. Must. get. off. internet.
Why are they even discussing Jersey???? Didn't the reporter show the witness a pic and it wasn't Jersey??
We don't know how many there were actually.
Kudos to KCPD for keeping most of the evidence close to the vest.
Keep the perps wondering; keep them off balance.
--jersey in court nov.1st.
I wouldn't be totally surprised if Jersey ends up playing a part in this, but I would be shocked to find that he took Lisa on his own. I think that, if anything, he was helping DB. And, this same statement would go for MW as well.
What's MH doing engaging in conversation with a suspicious, kind of shady guy who asked to use phones, etc.?
JVM Show
Jim B: we know Jersey is connected to the investigation, not at all to say is involved in disappearance
What's MH doing engaging in conversation with a suspicious, kind of shady guy who asked to use phones in people's homes?
The one the MEDIA was describing was different. This is pretty much what LE described except the shaved head.Is the one in court more like the one that was described to you? You kept saying the one that was described to you was not at all what was shown in pictures. Is that accurate? I understand if you can't answer.
Mike brooks said we are close to resolving this case. :waitasec: